|
Intranet-Based Education Conference
Report
By Hilary McLellan
On January 28-30, 1998, IQPC hosted a conference on Intranet-Based
Learning in the scenic French Quarter of New Orleans. This conference
offered a great deal of valuable information from people who
have integrated the Intranet into corporate education and performance
support in diverse and creative ways. IQPC, together with conference
partners Corporate Performance Resources and BDM International,
put together an excellent program.
Learning not Training
The conference speakers made
it clear that today the emphasis should be on learning, not training,
in planning and developing educational initiatives in a corporate
context. For example, Tony O'Driscoll of Nortel Technology quoted
Peter Senge:"Learning is a much more complicated phenomenon
than can ever be limited to a classroom. In organizational learning
efforts, the confusion of learning and training is fatal."
Senge's concept of the Learning
Organization was feautred extensively in the conference presentations.
For example, Robert Kelley, Director of Strategic Technology
at BDM International, commented, "We're not only concerned
with the learning needs of individuals, but the learning needs
of organizations." And Tony O'Driscoll presented a model
of organizational metamorphosis (see below) that outlines changes
in the dominant organizational structures across the agrarian
age, the industrial age, and the information age, where the learning
organization is a cornerstone.
| Changing Paradigms |
Agrarian Age (????-1760) |
Industrial Age (1760-1960) |
Information Age (1960-2020) |
| Infrastructure |
Local Market |
Railroads, Steel |
Computers, internet |
| Business |
Family farm |
The factory |
The Corporation |
| Technology |
The Plow |
The Machine |
The Computer |
| Primary
Asset |
Land |
Capital Equipment |
People |
| Main
Output |
Food Products |
Mechanical Products |
Knowledge Products |
| Organization |
Family Structure |
Bureacracy |
Learning Organization |
Jerry Neese, Training Programs
Manager at Sun Microsystems, explained that we are moving into
a new paradigm for framing corporate education that features
the following themes:
Moving from Teacher-centered
instruction to Learner-centered learning.
From a Single discipline focus
on one body of information to an Interdisciplinary approach relating
various bodies of information.
From an emphasis on problems
and drills to build a knowledge base toward an emphasis on authentic
learning problems that build critical thinking and problem solving
skills.
From the Individual being the
primary locus of learning to collaborating and learning groups.
From Learning Classrooms to
Learning Communities, based not on Geography or Time but by Interest
and/or Skill.
From having learning occur
during a Prescribed Time Period to Continual Learning.
Many speakers emphasized that
learning should be viewed as a strategic tool, so that enhanced
learning is synergistic with other business goals. David Owens,
the Vice President for Worldwide Professional Development at
Unisys explained that our conceptualization should be to increase
profitable revenue growth by accelerating learning to improve
performance and productivity. Within this framework, corporate
education is conceived more broadly than has been the case previously,
in a way that is more integrated with other priorities such as
performance improvement, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and
adapting to transitions in the marketplace and in the nature
of jobs. Kathryn Kidd, Manager of the Performance Consulting
Group at the Williams Companies, explained that at her company,
they have developed a system of scorecards to document savings
from investments in education in areas where savings claims are
made. So the scorecards show the benefit of investment in education,
such as the new Intranet-based system that has been implemented.
Related to this, Neese points
out, "Whole new careers are opening up but people must accept
a change in paradigm." Retraining is a critical consideration,
including the process of motivating people to buy into retraining,
retooling, and upgrading their skills.
| In times of change
the learner will inherit the earth, while the learned are beautifully
equipped for a world that no longer exists. Eric Hoffer |
Jerry Neese suggested that
corporate training professionals are now "creating a playing
field where people can learn" --- using a toolbox that includes
but is not limited to, the Intranet. It is no longer enough to
create content: there must be an environment (i.e., a playing
field) where people can interact not only with content, but with
tools such as search engines, databases, information filters
and pattern recognition tools, administrative tools, decision
support tools, job aids, etc., as well as on-the-job practice,
problem-solving, and learning for situations that cannot be predicted.
Robert Kelley, Director of
Strategic Technology at BDM International explained that web-based
learning environments are changing rapidly as a result of both:
The need to leverage human
assets and information assets within an organization.
The capability of technology
to significantly augment and enhance the performance of individuals
and organizations.
Kelly pointed out that Intranet
technologies are synonymous with a whole range of other technologies
that have converged in cyberspace.These converging technologies
provide a powerful panoply of resources for supporting education
and performance support. These converging technologies include:
Multimedia, video, voice, image,
text
Database technology
Object-oriented programming
Internetworking technologies
Knowledge-based reasoning,
coaching, advice
Adaptive pattern recognition
and programming.
Kelley emphasized that there
must be a complementary social architecture --- technology by
itself is not sufficient. And training alone isn't sufficient
--- therefore we need to build a mechanism for networking, for
bootstrapping on each other's experience and wisdom.
Intellectual Capital
Another theme highlighlighted
at this conference was the concept of intellectual capital.
David Owens of Unisys commented, "It's not what you own
that counts, it's what you know." Owens presented the following
model to explain how intellectual capital fits in to corporate
assets:
|
Human capital |
Structural capital |
Relationship capital |
|
Competencies |
Shared knowledge |
Market knowledge |
|
Mindset |
Culture/vision/strategy |
Marketing channels |
|
Motivation |
Processes/Methods |
Strategic alliances |
| |
Technologies/databases |
Customer relationships |
Jerry Neese pointed out that
consulting companies have only ever had intellectual capital.
Intellectual captial assets have been give short shrift in the
past because these are intangible assets, not readily subject
to measurement. But new technological tools are making it possible
to access and assess these intangible assets in a variety of
ways.
| Where is the
wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have
lost in information? T.S. Elliot |
Thomas Brailsford, Business
Research Manager at Hallmark, pointed out that 80% of intellectual
capital resides in your people and they go home at night. Brailsford
discussed how his company is using the Intranet to capture some
of that intellectual capital so that it does not reside exclusively
in the minds of employees. In particular, Hallmark is concerned
with capturing the expert knowledge of employees who will be
retiring soon. Stories provide a focal point for this program
since stories capture tacit knowledge. The goals of this initiative
are to make knowledge creation and knowledge leverage
easier. Knowledge leveraging means making specific knowledge
known by a few available to many within the company.
Hallmark set out to capture
"expert content" in a systematic way using the following
strategies:
Storytelling tools
Job-relevant exercises
Peer-to-peer conversations
Brailsford reported that Hallmark
adopted a new paradigm for knowledge leadership: A circle of
influence. This circle feautres three components that flow into
each other seamlessly and continuously in an infinite loop:
People (Creating knowledge)
Knowledge products
Tacit knowledge capture
Process (Sharing knowledge): nothing has value until it moves.
Connectivity - emailForums
Research university, speakers
Intranet - Voice of the Marketplace
Explicit knowledge - data, information, research abstracts, published
reports. The hard stuff.
Implicit knowledge - Experience, "Know How". The soft
stuff. The soft stuff is the hard stuff!
Purpose (Using knowledge)
Knowledge for growth & creativity
Knowledge to uderstand how people work together
Applied knowledge becomes a competetive advantage
Knowledge leverage has the
following beneficial effects:
- Common goals throughout the
organization
- Shared "expert content"
results in higher performing organization
- Common language
- Knowledge Communities promote
team aspect
- Applied Knowledge becomes
a competitive advantage
Selecting a Delivery System
Several speakers emphasized
that it is essential not to preselect the delivery medium. The
Intranet may not be the solution or it may not be the whole solution.
For example, it may be valuable to combine Intranet-based delivery
with CD ROM-based delivery. Another consideration is to decide
on the best technology for each stage of education delivery.
Jerry Neese pointed out that getting people trained faster is
cost efficient.
|